Dual-Booting: Difference between revisions
From Info Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Strictly for Geeks == |
== Strictly for Geeks == |
||
--[[User:Rpeters| |
--[[User:Rpeters|Rod]]11:28, 24 August 2012 (EST) |
||
[[Category: Technical Info]] |
[[Category: Technical Info]] |
Revision as of 02:59, 18 January 2015
For General Users
The idea of having both Windows and Linux installed on a computer and being able to select one at boot time appeals to many who are trying, or migrating to, Linux.
The better known Linux distributions will set this up automatically, during installation to a single hard disk drive in the computer It is likely to cease functioning following the next update of Windows and restoring dual-boot requires Getting Technical
Getting Technical
The above problem can usually be obviated by having additional hard disk(s) in the computer. This is not an expensive option, given current HDD prices.
USB Drive
Pros
- easily added
- no change to internal HDD
Cons
- Linux relies on the absolute order of storage devices detected by the computer's firmware
- plugging in (say) a uSB memory drive, may upset the booting
Internal HDD
- ensures permanent order of drives
Installation
- mainstream Linux will allow installation to a second hDD
- the bootloader must also be installed to the second HDD, in this technique
- can require "drilling down" the installation options
Selecting Boot Device
The selection of "drive" and hence OS is done at POST stage and depends on type of firmware in the computer
see Booting from Removable Media
Strictly for Geeks
--Rod11:28, 24 August 2012 (EST)